Redundancy (II): How to meditate with our redundant hands?

Tetsunori Koizumi, Director

Saigyo (1118-1190), known in Japanese history as one of the finest poets of waka, or thirty-one syllable verses, was a member of the elite corps of imperial palace guards before he became a Buddhist monk, disillusioned by the social turmoil in the last days of the Heian period. Saigyo traveled extensively while composing wakas. One example of the wakas he composed during his travels is the following, which was included in Shin Kokin-shu, or New Collection of Poems Ancient and Modern:

On the road along
A stream with clear water and
In the shade of a willow,
If only for a moment,
I take a break from my walk1

Living as he did in one century before Dogen (1200-1253) spread his teachings in Japan, Saigyo was not directly influenced by Soto Zen, or Dogen’s brand of Zen Buddhism. Nevertheless, it is clear from this waka that Saigyo was well aware of the state of samatha (serenity) and vipassana (insight) sought by practitioners of Zen meditation. As a mater of fact, Saigyo manages to skillfully combine walking meditation and standing meditation in a single waka, which are two of shiigi, or “four forms of meditation”—zazen (sitting meditation), gyozen (walking meditation), jyuzen (standing meditation), and gazen (lying meditation)—recognized in Zen Buddhism, especially in Soto Zen.

The four forms of meditation appear to have evolved out of the Zen tradition established by Huineng (638-713), the sixth patriarch of Chan Buddhism in China, who stressed the idea that every act at every moment in our daily living should be treated as a practice that could potentially lead us to samatha (serenity) and vipassane (insight). As for Dogen, it is well known that he singled out zazen as the only effective form of meditation in Zen practice as represented by his idea of shikantaza, or “just sitting”, or his words recorded in Fukanzazengi (Universal Recommendation for Zazen): “The zazen I speak of is not learning meditation. It is simply the Dharma-gate of repose and bliss, the practice-realization of totally culminated enlightenment.”2 In this, Dogen was following the form of practice set up by Bodhidharma, the founder of Chan Buddhism, who is said to have lost the use of his legs after sitting in meditation for nine years facing the wall of a cave. This is also the form of practice inherited by Nyojyo (1163-1228), who was Dogen’s teacher while he studied and trained in China.

Dogen’s insistence on zazen as the only effective form of meditation in Zen practice naturally raises the question of how to conduct that sitting meditation. Here again, Dogen is quite specific as to how to sit and meditate: “At the site of your regular sitting, spread out thick matting and place a cushion above it. Sit either in the full-lotus or half-lotus position. In the full-lotus position you first place your right foot on your left thigh and your left foot on your right thigh. In the half-lotus you simply press your left foot against your right thigh. … Then place your right hand on your left leg and your left palm (facing upwards) on your right palm, thumb tips touching. Thus sit upright in correct bodily posture, neither inclining to the left nor to the right, neither leaning forward or backward.”3

While allowing a choice between the full-lotus and the half-lotus position for legs and feet, Dogen does not allow a similar choice for hands and fingers, for his instructions for the positioning of hands and the forming of fingers are quite specific. Why is Dogen so fastidious about the way our hands are positioned and fingers are formed? Looking at the Buddha statues found in many countries in Asia, including Japan, we find wide variations in hands and fingers gestures, known as mudras. Some statues show the Buddha with his right hand raised and his left hand placed on the left knee, some two hands joined in the middle of the body, some one hand placed on top of the other, and others both his hands placed on the knees. Of the two famous Buddha statues in Japan, the one in Kamakura shows the Buddha’s two hands joined in a mudra known as samadhi mudra (concentration gesture), while the one in Nara shows the Buddha’s right hand raised in a mudra known as abhaya mudra (fearlessness gesture) and his left hand placed on his left knee.

Wide variations in hands and fingers gestures are what is to be expected from the fact that human hands have been made redundant in the process of evolution when our ancestors started to walk on two legs, making it possible for us to use our hands for other purposes than just for locomotion. While hands thus freed from locomotion have found many usages, both beneficial and harmful, hands in zazen serve as another example of the flexibility that redundancy allows, for the state of meditative concentration can be accomplished with a variety of hands and fingers gestures. Redundancy can thus be considered good news for practitioners of meditation, as each practitioner is able to choose a specific gesture that is most comfortable and conducive to concentration.

  1. Translated from: 「道の辺に清水流るる柳陰しばしとてこそ立ちどまりつれ」
  2. Fukanzazengi (Universal Recommendation for Zazen), from The Art of Just Sitting: Essential Writings on the Zen Practice of Shikantaza, edited by John Daido Loori, Boston: Wisdom Publications, 2002.
  3. ibid.

After all, Valentine’s Day is another day

Tetsunori Koizumi, Director

Valentine’s Day, while started out as a liturgical celebration for a Christian saint, has become a universal day of celebration of love in countries all over the world, Christian as well as non-Christian. In most countries, it is recognized as a special day for lovers as they express and confirm their love for each other by exchanging cards, flowers, or sweets. In Japan, however, which is a non-Christian country with the number of Christians comprising two percent of the population at the most, Valentine’s Day has become the day when females can openly express their love for their male friends without fear of inviting social criticism for being too aggressive in expressing their personal feelings. To make things equal between the sexes, the Japanese have invented White Day, which falls on March 14, as the day when males can openly express their love for their female friends by sending chocolates—preferably white chocolates—to them from whom they had received the gift of love a month earlier on February 14.

The issue of who invented the custom of White Day in Japan and for what reason is not firmly settled and still being debated. It would be nice if it had been invented expressly for males as their Valentine’s Day, for it would give an opportunity for them, especially for those who are naturally shy and timid, to openly declare their love to their female friends. Some cynics say, however, that the idea of White Day actually came from some enterprising merchants who wanted to increase their sales of chocolates and other sweet products. If that had been the case, White Day would carry less significance as another special day for lovers to express and confirm their love for each other. It would instead become a day to confirm love of money on the part of chocolate makers. Be that as it may, the custom of White Day, now widely observed in Japan, offers an interesting example of the way a certain custom developed in one culture goes through transformation as it is adopted and absorbed by another culture.

Love of money, or the profit motive, although widely embraced as the motive behind economic transactions all over the world in the age of global capitalism, does not mean that money is the only object of love. Indeed, there are all kinds of things that become objects of love, things which people become passionate about, such as beauty, country, food, liberty, music, reading, sports, wine, work, and so on. And, of course, there is love of knowledge, which drives philosophers and scientists to seek knowledge of the world around us. If objects of love are many, so are adjectives used to describe love: blind love, eternal love, secret love, sweet love, true love, unrequited love, and so on. And there is unconditional love, an adjective usually reserved as a special reference to Jesus’ love for mankind.

Indeed, Christianity is one religion that has elevated love as a supreme goal for its practitioners, as is typified by Jesus’ message: “Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you.” (Matthew 5:44) Love Jesus is talking about here is not love in the usual sense of that word as affection or passion between two individuals. It is love of mankind, the kind of love that is extended to all human beings, which Plato and Greek philosophers called agape, or “universal love”, to distinguish it from eros, or “bodily love” and phila, or “brotherly love”.

Love is also important for Buddhist practitioners. In Buddhism, however, love of all human beings is not enough: Love must be extended to all living beings, to all things endowed with the Buddha-nature. Moreover, this love, or metta, which is usually translated as “loving-kindness”, is one form of practice, one of the four meditations called brahmavihara, the other three being: karuna, or “compassion”, mudita, or “altruistic joy”, and upekkha, or “equanimity”.

The word brahmavihara literally means “Brahma’s abode”, which is also translated as “divine abodes”. Brahma’s name is employed by the Buddha to characterize the four meditations because, as is recorded in Subha Sutta, he is responding to a question put to him by the Brahman student Subha. The Buddha recommends the four meditations to Subha if he is to find the path to the divine abodes to be in the company of Brahma: “What, student, is the path to the company of Brahma? Here a monk dwells pervading one quarter with a mind imbued with loving-kindness, … one quarter with a mind imbued with compassion, … one quarter with a mind imbued with altruistic joy, … one quarter with a mind imbued with equanimity, …” (Majjhima Nikaya 99)

Whether we are declaring our first love, or confirming our old love, on Valentine’s Day, we are expressing our attachment to someone special as the object of our love as passion by sending cards, flowers, or sweets. Let us remind ourselves, however, that there is no such thing as eternal love, for love, like everything else in the world around us, is impermanent and subject to suffering. As the Buddha reminds us in his first discourse he delivered in the Deer Park at Isipatana, “separation from what is pleasing is suffering”. (Samyutta Nikaya 56) What we need to remind ourselves as Buddhist practitioners on Valentine’s Day is not just love as passion but love as practice, namely, the need to constantly practice meditations to cultivate metta, karuna, mudita and upekkha so that we, too, can reach brahmavihara. After all—to paraphrase the memorable, closing words of Scarlet O’Hara in Gone with the Wind—Valentine’s Day is another day … for Buddhist practitioners.